Skip to main content

Is Dune a white saviour story?

 No.

There's been some buzz around the internet around the recently launched film Dune, directed by Dennis Villeneuve. I've anticipated and been hungry for this movie for many years now. I'm a huge Dune fanboi, and the book by Frank Herbert, first published (as a series) back in 1965 is a seminal and highly important book to me, one I've read more times than I dare to count. We're talking 30+.

Some of that buzz has been about Dune being a white saviour story, where some priviledged white person comes into a native setting and saves them from their ignorance, starts a revolution and captures the princess. There's a lot of these stories thruogh history, and it glorifies the superiority of the white race or white culture, and is aiming to seem kind and ethical while at the same time being snotty and racist.

Dune is not that story. Without spoiling anything else about the story, in case you're new to the world of Frank Herbert, it's the opposite of that. There are plenty of hints of this throughout Dune (the first book), and made blatatly obvious in the second book, Dune Messiah.

The reason a lot of people might mistake the Dune as having this priviledged issue is that the movie is only the first half of the first book. But don't judge a book by its first half. It is not that story. It's the opposite.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Hyper AI : Sam Harris and his techno-bros on Artificial Intelligence

TL;DR: Don't be seduced by Hollywood bullshit! Engage those critical thinking skills Bias and background Recently someone asked Sam Harris in his " Ask me anything #1 " episode about his latest views on Artificial Intelligence  ( AI for short ), and they weren't all positive. You see, he's lately been invited along to a conference on the matter of threats to human existence, and AI feature very, very high on the list of potential human extinguishers. He lists Elon Musk as his friend and inviter, and within the conference refers to " people close to development of AI " that all agree with the following; AI's will get smarter or more advanced than the human intelligence, will be able to modify and improve their own code, and come to some negative conclusion about us puny humans, whereas the next logical step is, of course, " Exterminate the humans! " I might be paraphrasing. Harris didn't list who these people " close to the

The Skeptics guide to Artificial Intelligence

I have been listening regularly for a few years to the Skeptics Guide to the Universe , and I like it a lot. But sometimes you've got an itch than just won't easily scratch away, and this is one of those times. I should note that sent this to the website through their contact form, but I've never been lucky getting anything through (or any response) from doing so several times in the past, which is why I post it here so it doesn't go to waste. I don't actually know if anything goes through there, or I'm ignored, or marked as spam, or they're too busy with my pedestrian requests, could be anything. Normally I wouldn't care, but I wrote this rather lengthy letter about something I care deeply about (and hopefully also can teach someone out there something about the neuance of the topic) and decided to share it. My Skeptics guide to Artificial Intelligence is written with a love for the show. ------------- So. You know how you guys sometimes riff over the

Could it be?

Quoting  Archbishop Silvano Tomasi (via the always wonderful Butterflies and Wheels )  ; "People are being attacked for taking positions that do not support sexual behaviour between people of the same sex." Could it be because you have offensive opinions and actions, and that you constantly persecute people you don't agree with? Could it be that people are getting fed up with your hypocrisy of attacking people of a sexual orientation you yourself so obviously are filled to the brim with? Could it be that science is shedding a more reflective and correct light on what the alternative sexual orientations are all about, that biology shouldn't be dictated by doctrine and opinion? The mind boggles at religious people's stubbornness to change, to just understand that more knowledge through unbiased science renders you old and outdated, that unless you embrace change it will render you pointless but to the crazy fringe. Merge new understanding into your fold, by all m